[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index] Re: Audi 5000 was called 100
>From: "Peter Fraser" <peter_fraser@macmail.lbl.gov> > Reply to: RE>> Audi 5000 was called 10 >Hi, everybody. The following chain of stuff got me a little riled (after all, >we're all part of this group because we own, and hopefully, like Audis), so I > ... more stuff ... >Anyway, I feel that overall Audi tries hard (for me, personally, and I hope the >majority of you all) - so I wanted to try to get the end of the story out there >as well. > >Your thoughts? > I am sorry that Dave Patterson has had lots of problems with his Audi. My experience is totally different. I have two Audis: a 1982 4000S and a 1990 200. The 4000 has 160,000 miles, still gets the same gas mileage and emissions levels of 8 years ago. Compression is like new in 3 of the 4 cyliners and that lower one is within spec. I have replaced nothing major except the radiator and A/C condenser. Other things like shocks, brakes, exhaust have shown above average longevity. The body has rust on the leading edge of the hood and a couple of bubbles on a couple doors and the trunk lid. Not bad for almost 11 years in New England. I have owned this car since new. I bought the 1990 200 in April of this year. It has performed flawlessly. Most of the problems with it have been extremely minor: broken trim piece, light out on one of the dash switches. It also needed the lifters replaced(?). My dealer, Pass & Weisz of Burlington, MA has replaced everyting I asked under warranty, no questions asked, no matter how trivial. We'll see if it ends up being as good as the 4000. I really drives great! Not all (or even most?) experiences with Audis are bad. Mine have been great. ------------------------------------------ Peter Tracy KEPS, Inc. 164 Lexington Road Billerica, MA 01821 Internet: pgt@keps.com CompuServe: 76500,2535 ------------------------------------------
|