[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: Radar detector/jammers
> > > The legal, grey area of getting caught with a "passive" detector is
> > > bad enough. I hate to think what a transmitting jammer would do to
> > > to a city's coffer.
> There's nothing illegal about a truly passive jammer.
Just to be clear as mud, I used '"passive" detector' to mean that most
detectors may transmit due to leakage from its local oscillator. I used
"passive" to convey the absence of transmitted signal, instead of
"conditional/smart jamming". Sorry for the confusion.
> But it's about
> as useful for radar jamming as a rabbit's foot would be. I mean from
> FCC perspective here;
> some states may have laws in this area; I know a couple of states ban
> radar detectors.
That's what I meant by "The legal, grey area of getting caught ... with
> Walter Meares Intermetrics, Inc. firstname.lastname@example.org
> Information Systems 733 Concord Ave Cambridge MA 02138
> (617) 661-1840