About Audifans
Mailing Lists
Archives Knowledge Base and FAQ
HOME Marketplace
NEW: Recommended Parts Suppliers
NEW: Recommended Mechanics


[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: 4000Q Vs ur-Q


  • To: quattro@coimbra.ans.net (Non Receipt Notification Requested) (IPM Return Requested)
  • Subject: Re: 4000Q Vs ur-Q
  • From: glen.powell@smc.com
  • Date: 17 Mar 1995 07:28:40 -0500
  • Autoforwarded: FALSE
  • Importance: normal
  • P1-Content-Type: P2
  • P1-Message-Id: US*ATTMAIL*SMCLAN;X400ATT Mar 17 07:28:40 1995
  • P1-Recipient: quattro@coimbra.ans.net
  • Priority: normal
  • Sender: quattro-owner@coimbra.ans.net
  • Ua-Content-Id: 392807170395
  • X400-Trace: US*ATTMAIL*SMCLANarrival 17 Mar 1995 07:28:40 -0500action Relayed

  As has been pointed out, "standard" equipment varies quite a bit
  depending on the target market for the car. My points were all relative
  to US-spec ur-Qs and the '85 model in particular, 'cause that's the one
  I'm most familiar with. YMMV.

  -glen