[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: Vendor Access
>>If the content is factual and relevant to any question that a
>>non-vendor may have posed then the vendor is providing a
>Here lies the problem folks, Just how do we know that the info is factual
>much less relevant. Slick 50 is the greatest thing in the world and probally
>cures cancer according to the claims of the seller. The really important word
>here to remember is SELLER.
Yeah, the only thing slick about schlock 50 was the advertising.
>My real life job is shooting commercials for TV and to be perfectly honest
>there not, so I speak from experience.
I agree with Eric. Currently we trust each others motives - and some have
even shared secrets that I wouldn't have expected. I would really hate to
approach each email with a caveat emptor attitude.
>Just my $1.49
were up to $1.51