[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index] Re: Factory exh performance?
> > Is anyone concerned with the legality of an empty cat? ... I believe in reduced emissions and the continuing effort here. If fact, good ol' Boise Idaho is on the list of federally mandated emissions testing as a metropolitan area. Pretty silly until one considers the inversions we get here in the winter. What really peaves me are the limits set depending on year of manufacture. Pre-68 has no limit and when I need to drive somewhere (I bike to work) I typically see one or more smoke belchers. I wonder how they pass the test... Oh I know! If one flunks, spend $40 on "repairs" and still flunk, that car is OK for another year. One gets three years of this before the car is denied registration. But then registration enforcement is lax too. Now, OUR well tuned Audi's do very well in these tests. The test here does not measure NOx, just HC and CO. My car measures 0% CO and 7 ppm HC with it's cat in place. I wonder what a non-cat one would measure? If I were in charge for a day.... I'd start taking those old smoke belchers off the road first before I'd go after (mostly) complient well maintained cars such as all ours. Right? Right! IMHO, IDH, DFMFMO, .... Bob Kunz bkunz@boi.hp.com
|