On Mon, 12 Feb 1996, Glen Powell wrote:
> Sure, less is better, but c'mon man!
> You tryin' to tell me that the relative rotational mass of the prowler
> brakes Vs that of the viper brakes accounts for the better braking *more*
> than does the relative mass of the vehicle and relative amounts of swept area?
I don't know the actual proportion. Both of these factors
certainly contribute. I _do_ believe form Dynamics class, that the
rotors will have more effect on braking than just their mass alone. The
fact that it is rotating makes it more important. You may be right, that
the vehicle mass is more important in this case, I don't know without
seeing the numbers.
Graydon D. Stuckey
Flint, Michigan USA
'86 Audi 5000 CS Turbo Quattro, GDS Racing Stage II
'85 Mazda RX7 GS 12A-leaning-towards-a-13B-soon