(Fwd) Returned mail: User unknown

[cngnyec@pipeline.com (Richard Davis)]

>----- Forwarded message (Mail Delivery Subsystem
<MAILER-DAEMON@pipeline.com>) -----< 
 
 
This is a MIME-encapsulated message 
 
--LAA16968.824401827/mail.nyc.pipeline.com 
 
The original message was received at Thu, 15 Feb 1996 11:30:21 -0500 (EST)
from  
cngnyec@pipe4.nyc.pipeline.com [198.80.32.44] 
 
----- The following addresses have delivery notifications ----- 
<quttro@coimbra.ans.net>  (unrecoverable error) 
 
----- Transcript of session follows ----- 
... while talking to coimbra.ans.net.: 
>>> RCPT To:<quttro@coimbra.ans.net> 
<<< 550 <quttro@coimbra.ans.net>... User unknown 550  
<quttro@coimbra.ans.net>... User unknown 
 
--LAA16968.824401827/mail.nyc.pipeline.com 
Content-Type: message/delivery-status 
 
Reporting-MTA: dns; mail.nyc.pipeline.com 
Received-From-MTA: dns; pipe4.nyc.pipeline.com 
Arrival-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 11:30:21 -0500 (EST) 
 
Final-Recipient: rfc822; quttro@coimbra.ans.net 
Action: failed 
Status: 5.2.0 
Remote-MTA: dns; coimbra.ans.net 
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 <quttro@coimbra.ans.net>... User unknown 
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 11:30:25 -0500 (EST) 
 
--LAA16968.824401827/mail.nyc.pipeline.com 
Content-Type: message/rfc822 
 
Return-Path: cngnyec@pipeline.com 
Received: from pipe4.nyc.pipeline.com (cngnyec@pipe4.nyc.pipeline.com  
[198.80.32.44]) by mail.nyc.pipeline.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id
LAA16957;  
Thu, 15 Feb 1996 11:30:21 -0500 (EST) 
Received: (cngnyec@localhost) by pipe4.nyc.pipeline.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) id  
LAA20012; Thu, 15 Feb 1996 11:30:21 -0500 
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 11:30:21 -0500 
Message-Id: <199602151630.LAA20012@pipe4.nyc.pipeline.com> 
To: a-powell1@tamu.edu 
Subject: Re: AudiOnly 
From: cngnyec@nyc.pipeline.com (Richard Davis) 
Cc: quttro@coimbra.ans.net 
X-PipeUser: cngnyec 
X-PipeHub: nyc.pipeline.com 
X-PipeGCOS: (Richard Davis) 
X-Mailer: The Pipeline v3.4.0 
 
Al,  
While I meant to be critical of the present situation, the service I did
get  
from Peter @ AudiOnly was great while it lasted, indeed I passed him on to 

others.  Your line that you "got him in the office by coincidence" is sort
of  
my point,  we don't have to "suspect" what is going on when people leave  
answering machine messages saying they are on vacation or otherwise  
incommunicado.  I personally like to support the independants when possible
as  
I am one in a different field.  But I also feel bad when others I've
mentioned  
him to aren't enjoying my past experiences.  For the moment I feel kind of
like  
a Baltimore resident after the Colts left in the middle of the night.  
 
Mike  (Waiting for Godot or Peter) 
 
--LAA16968.824401827/mail.nyc.pipeline.com--