[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: 91 V8Q
Eliot Lim wrote:
> i seem to remember 278 bhp and 295 lbft vs. 240 bhp and 245 or 250 lbft
> but that's the best that my memory serves.
Y'know, those are mighty big numbers: I've never driven
a V8, but this car must haul serious a**! Essentially
the same body and drive-train as my 200Q, but with lots
more hp and torque.
So ... why didn't this car sell better than it did? Or,
why did Audi choose to drop the engine altogether?
I mean, they've been flogging the I-5 for nearly
two decades now.
Mind you, I *love* the turbo I-5 -- nothing like
the sound of that engine in full song -- but the V8
does sound like one hell of a car.
1001 W. Cutting Blvd.
Pt. Richmond, CA 94804
- Re: 91 V8Q
- From: Eliot Lim <email@example.com>