[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: V12? Why not V10 twin-turbo? (fwd) (fwd) (fwd) (gesundheit!)
Once more, the noble, erudite (and probably handsome as hell) Bill Van Bibber
comes to the old rutabegs's aid:
> Unka Bart wonders aloud, so I mayst pontificate:
> 928 engine weight
> 1978-79 573 pounds
> 80-81-82 540 pounds
> 83S 574 pounds
> 84S 574 pounds
> All weights are dry, according to the Engine manual, pages 0.3-0.15.
> Do I win the Geek-o-the-Week award?
Nay, kind sir, Au Contraire! You have just earned the humanitarian-of-the-week
award. And you stand exposed for all the world to see, that you are a man of
rare taste in fine german metal and encyclopedic knowledge; the very embodiment
of chivalry, a truly noble spirit.
Ain't it a pity there's so few of us left...?
Yer Kindly (and not to mention, grateful) ol' Unka Bart
PS - OK Eliot, I showed you mine, now lessee yours - he said with a huge grin
as he ambled off into the darkening ether...
SOB (same ol' Bart)