[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
> On Aug 26, 9:03am, Steve Powers wrote:
> > Subject: ipd
> > These cars were 850s. Turbocharged, 5 cylinder models. Claimed a sub
> > 6 second time for the sedan after the mods (0 - 60 mph). I'd be
> > awfully skeptical of this.
> Well, don't be. Even the stock 850 Turbo is quite a beast - just
> yesterday, I was surprised by a wagon (two kids in the third
> seat waving, your complete stereotype) pulling away from me in
> my 200Q going *uphill*. It's usually me that's doing the
> pulling away ...
> Yeah, I know, I know -- different story in the wet etc. etc.. But
> still ...
I have driven the 850 Turbo wagon (w/ traction control) and own the S6
wagon (w/ EDL and AWD). IMHO, the S6 is faster under any conditions.
I will admit that the 850 I drove was a slush-o-matic, but I didn't
think the 850 compared all that favorably power-wise. Strong, yes,
but the Audi was _way_ stronger. Like you said, in the wet there's
even a bigger difference.
I think you encountered a modified car. I also don't know how strong the
200 is compared to the S6.
steve powers ... '95.5 S6 ... '95 620RX/C ... '91 K100RS-16V ... '88 R100S
email@example.com * stratos product development group * seattle, washington
"I must tell you that these are strong Bavarian beer-carrying horses, not
the smaller ones of Italy." (Ferdinand Piech)