[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: Too good to be true..
At 10:50 AM 11/8/96 -0500, Dan Masi wrote:
>But I've gotta disagree here. Low beam *pattern* is perfect,
>IMO. But low beam *intensity* is pitiful. High beams could
>stand a bit more power, too. IMHO. So I'd be interested in
>hearing about A4 lighting solutions.
Well put. Although I don't have a problem with the high beams from a
strength standpoint, they just don't seems as focused.
>BTW, what about the fog lights on the A4? Is that yet another
>element built into the same bulb, or is it a separate bulb?
I'm pretty sure this is a seperate bulb...