[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: MB vs RR
On Tue, 28 Jan 1997, Dave Lawson wrote:
> smoother motor, more power, more low down torque and better gearing, revised
> suspension to further decrease understeer, better brakes and lower miles on the
> car you purchase. oh and lower maintenance costs....
They seem a lot smoother to me. Also less turbo lag (or so it seems anyway)
> A few questions here:
> better gearing? were the ratios revised for the 20V turbo ur-q? I'm not aware of
Well if they do different speeds in each gear, the ratios must of been
> revised suspension? I have heard that some 20V turbo ur-qs came with cast
Not sure on the suspension set up.
> better brakes? The MB ur-qs got the 2 piston front calipers and I'm not aware
> of the 20V turbo ur-qs getting anything different. What does yours have?
I thought they had the same brakes as well.
Anyone wanna swap for an S2 ;-)
Systems Administrator, PA Data Design
4 Wheels - Audi Quattro - 88 Model UK Audi Quattro Owners Club
2 Wheels - Suzuki RG500 - 88 Model Might be able to insure it one day
4 Legs - A raving *nutter* horse Just on Loan
2 Legs - Shanks Pony Last resort