[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index] Re: AWD v. The Others
On 19 Jan 97 at 9:00, Doug Miller, in part, wrote: > The advantages on the street would go to AWD due to the ability to cope > with a wider variety of situations at a higher throttle setting without > upsetting the vehicle's balance. And I have my own anecdotal evidence: Near where I live, there's a marvelous L-R-L sequence, snaking up a hill in less than 200 yards. The asphalt is in vile shape, with lots of holes & patches where it vanishes into the gravel shoulder. My wife's former Z-28 (she now has an AWD turbo Talon) would dance all over the place (more or less predictably), skipping from bump to bump. My ur-Quattro & my present Galant VR4 gave the feeling of digging in, grabbing hold, leaping forward, totally under control, and the only thing limiting the rate of knots uphill was responsibility - the whole right side of the road being lined with houses. Late at night, with someone to run interference, I've run this route at a shocking rate of speed, and AWD just gets more stable. Similarly, when the first big snow falls, I would take the Z-28 to the nearest large & vacant parking lot & practice doing doughnuts. Ever try to do a doughnut with AWD? VERY hard, requires serious throttle & wheel brutality, usually not very good doughnuts, either, as control returns too damned fast. Nevertheless, I go out each winter & do my duty.... The viscous diff on the Galant's AWD takes a noticeable amount of time to warm up & to lock up. My ur-Quattro had a better front-to-rear balance. Anybody got a comparison on this stunt with a Torsen? Gene R. Rankin / Madison, WI / USA
|