[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: Timing belt. To change, or not to change...?
At 08:17 PM 4/4/97 -0500, you wrote:
> I listened to a tip from a race mechanic years ago [no, nothing
>to do with an Audi:)] and that tip was to change rubber parts at regular
>intervals--even if on visual inspection things appear to be fine.
> On the timing belt, I have heard similar advice [it never needs
>changed...] on different cars, but I have to ask myself why? At best, it
>will last until it breaks. Then what. Even on non-interference motors,
>do the right thing---it really is not that expensive. Remember Mr.
>Murphy, he rides with all of us. The day that you absolutely positively
>must have the car, that is when the timing belt, radiator hose, etc.,
>will decide they have had enough. Just a little advice from someone who
>knows Mr. Murphy all too well.
>agreeIchanged mine on my200 at 80k, and while it
wasent tattered, it was well worn. also the h20
pump o-ring was leaking a bit so I replaced it as well. Dealer wanted $605
for the job'
parts (good quality german) came to $73.
Ive done this job on my 82 coupe, and this was
somewhat more difficult - particularly removing the cam gear bolt. mike
posner .posne@ cts.com