[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: US 98 2.8 A4 commercial (30v in racing???)
Why could you get a higher average speed with an Audi than with an
all-out open-wheel racing car?
- Better aerodynamics
(Open-wheel racers have a Cd higher than a brick, thanks to the
exposed tires and the big wings. On a steeply banked track like
Nardi or Talladega, the Audi would need little in terms of spoilers.)
- Many fewer fuel stops
(Thanks to better aerodynamics and no fuel tank size limit.)
- No yellow flags
(This is really the killer at most CART/IRL races for average speed.)
Tom Haapanen -- Software Metrics Inc. -- Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
A Microsoft Solution Provider Partner -- http://www.metrics.com/
> -----Original Message-----
> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 1997 16:07:01 -0700
> From: "andrew speer" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Subject: Re: US 98 2.8 A4 commercial (30v in racing???)
> O.K. I'm stumped How do you get a "stock" bodied car to average over
> 200 MPH for such long distances? [...]
> I don't follow CART (or whatever Indycars care called nowadays) but
> time I checked the winning speed at Indianapolis was under 200 MPH.
> And we
> are only talking 500 Miles there.
> I understand these cars make substantially more power than the claimed
> hp for the record breaking Audi. As open wheeled racers I don't know
> the aerodynamic comparison would be with the stock-looking Audi...but
> assume the Audi would also have needed drag producing spoilers to
> sufficient downforce to stay on the track at those speeds.