[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
At 11:14 AM 7/23/97 GMT, Phil Payne wrote:
>The best idea, IMO, is an anti-scan remote arming alarm that _ISN'T_
>to the door locks.
In my '94 90 CSQ I had installed a Viper 300+ alarm. Its anti-scan, remote
(and passive) arming, and it IS connected to the door locks. In fact, it
required a special vacuum adapter to work with Audi's door locks.
But I'm curious: Why are you opposed to connecting up the door locks to a
third-party alarm? Unlike a factory alarm, in this instance unlocking the
doors should NOT disarm the third-party alarm. (To my mind, the fact that
unlocking the doors disarms most factory alarms is the biggest reason not
to trust 'em).
In my opinion, the best car alarm would be nuclear. ;-)
Mark H. Granoff Mark.Granoff@Software.com
Software.com, Inc. - The Internet Infrastructure Company (tm)
91 Hartwell Avenue, Lexington, MA 02173
Phone: +1.617.274.7000 x226, FAX: +1.617.674.1080, W3: www.software.com
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed herein are not necessarily Software.com's.
- From: email@example.com (Phil Payne)