[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: RM-EM logic

QSHIPQ wrote:

>  >
>  Randall proposes the following with now trademark "RM" (tm) logic:
> >> Maybe the same reason they liked those big single turbos on the the 911.
>  Randall >>

  Nice attack.  No you misunderstand,  you use whoever to justify any point of
yours(in this case) after saying they were wrong in the turbo fiasco.  Is Porsche

right or wrong?

Now to the real issue.  I NEVER said I felt this was a performance issue.  If I
did please show me.  I agree that the car is cooler.  I don't know of anything
else.  I disagree with you that the head or turbo will get cooked because of the
coating.  If the EM is not as hot,  it will not radiate heat to surrounding
areas/parts.  The exhaust gases will not concentrate/superheat the adjacent parts

anymore than in the stock uncoated manifold.  If so "do the math and show me the

As for the slam,  I see your complaints about buzzers(which I interpret as being
against bad manners) only applies to others on the list, not you.  Get off my
back for the innocent joke.

Merry Christmas to all,

Randall C. Markarian

1990 V8 Quattro
1996 Merc E320

Saint Louis, Missouri