Re: Not a bite to be had

To: phil@isham-research.demon.co.uk
Subject: Re: Not a bite to be had
From: "Randall C. Markarian" <asenna@accessus.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 1998 20:47:05 -0600
CC: quattro@coimbra.ans.net
References: <253372@isham-research.demon.co.uk>
Sender: owner-quattro@coimbra.ans.net

Phil Payne wrote:

> I have read it.  It's full of static considerations - nothing about the likely
> process times within the device.

Bingo!  There are too many variables for the very few number of q-listers who have
been "bitten by the spider" to say conclusively what caused it.  Driver error
anyone?

Randall

References:
- Not a bite to be had
  - From: quk@isham-research.demon.co.uk (Phil Payne)

Prev by Author: Re: Catchup on my Rings - please
Next by Author: Re: Boris?
Prev by thread: Not a bite to be had
Next by thread: 1.8 bar wastegate spring
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread