[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Q45 vs. 200

Come on guys. I know you all have more sense than this. I obviously can
not have tested all Jap cars. This is only common sense. You and most have
read it as of the cars I've tested. Simple common sense. That's it.

*Steve                                       Sachelle Babbar
*'84  5ksT 1.6-2.0 bar                    <SBABBAR@IRIS.NYIT.EDU>
*Cockpit adjustable wastegate, AudiSport badge
*Disclaimer:"Any information contained herein is based purely on my own
*personal experience and may not necessarily reflect yours. Use caution as
*your results may vary from mine."

On Tue, 17 Mar 1998, Bruce Aukerman wrote:

> >>>all japanese cars have failed<<<
> As was pointed out, try the 300z.  Or, how about the last generation
> RX7t, Supra t, [or either of those in NA form], sc400, NSX [little
> pricey, agreed], gsr, etc.  Plethora of fun Japanese cars, but, they
> don't have the old Audi quirks, I admit.