[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: OPINION WANTED : Audi as a "consumer" vehicle (long)
Tomas Leveckis decided to speak these words:
> I dont understand this one. I have never heard of the quattro system
> costing anything as far as maintainance...am i wrong? i just dont
> consider it ia maintainance item...i dunno
>Statements like that without substantiation should be ignored........
Okie, how bout you just jump on me asap huh?
How bout i elaborate to make you happy. I consider it to be essentially
a non maintainance item due to the fact that my car has the original
components of the q system. This includes orig tranny, rear diff,
driveshaft, rear CV's rear CV boots etc etc....perhaps my statement only
applies to the 4kq...
However i rarely on this list hear of someone who has a failure of the
system itself. If anything, its going to be the vacuum lines or
something relatively cheap...nothing expensive breaks except under
extreme circumstances...as far as i know...
is that better?
Michael Sheridan Williams
1985 4000 S Quattro 182,000+ miles, Turbo conversion soon?, Koni
Yellows/2Bennett, strut brace, Sport 8000 Tires, K&N, MOMO 4pt harnesses,
Hella XL Driving lights (2x135w), magnecor wires....<out of breath>
1986 Oceanic Blue, 4000CS Quattro--Parting Out(ask if you want anything)
My father's: 1986 4000 CS Quattro--Graphite 161,000 miles