[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
In message <3630312B.2E512EAA@uidaho.edu> Todd Phenneger writes:
> Uhh, "Because they get better with Age" would be the reasonable
> answer for the wine. Wasn't aware this held true with Audi Shocks
> though. !? Not disputing but can you explain your quiz. Whats your
No - it's because they need to be turned periodically in storage.
The issue arose during a discussion of the defective brake servo
pressure switch (made in 1991) that Audi shipped me a month of so back -
I'm progressing this with Audi because I believe this is a safety issue.
How many people have fitted replacement servos with defective switches?
I don't know. Remember that the failure mode is _NOT_ to warn about
an absence of brake assist - i.e., the very opposite of fail-safe.
Anyway, we got into the old "Verfallsdatum" issue on parts, and it
turns out that instead of using tight shelf lives, they're issuing
more detailed instructions on parts storage.
Phone: 0385 302803 Fax: 01536 723021
(The contents of this post will _NOT_ appear in the UK Newsletter.)