[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

RE: Observations of a BIG circle

The web site needs improvement to make it simple to search for
information in the archives.  Currently, it's a time consuming and
awkward task to look through all the archives in search of questions and
answers.  I know I have asked questions which may have been covered one
or two or three years ago, but I'd be there forever looking manually on
the web site.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Music Research Corp. [SMTP:mureco@telenet.net]
> Sent:	Friday, November 06, 1998 2:25 PM
> To:	R. Shayne Pavlic'; Audi Quattro
> Subject:	Re: Observations of a BIG circle
> Hi R. Shayne!
>         You certainly have "hit the point"!  Not too long ago, certain
> committees were formed to address this on-going aggravation.  Maybe
> Dan can
> give us an idea how these volunteers are doing organizing the wealth
> of
> information from the Archives.
> Wayne Scheer
> Amsterdam, NY
> -----Original Message-----
> From: R. Shayne Pavlic' <bcpi@arias.net>
> To: Audi Quattro <quattro@coimbra.ans.net>
> Date: Thursday, November 05, 1998 11:05 PM
> Subject: Observations of a BIG circle
> >We just covered that.......  Check the archives it was just
> covered.........
> > And so on.  I have been a member of the list for nearly two years
> now and
> >find it quite humorous that there always seems to be a couple of us
> that
> ask
> >questions "That were just covered" or give the response to the
> questions.
> A
> >thought also occured.  Since about the first month of being on the
> list I
> >have been reading the same questions and same answers over and over.
> I
> >guess the point is untill our Audi's fly, there will not be many new
> >questions or answer emerging.  So, on that note I formulate this
> question:
> >What constitutes a question that was just covered.  One spoken about
> 2
> weeks
> >ago?  8?  4 Months?  A year?
> >
> >No negative conotations implied here, just curious.
> >
> >Could the answer be:  Those with better memories have about a year
> time?
> >Those without good memories about 2 weeks?
> >
> >
> >Hmmmmmm, there I ramble again.
> >
> >Oh well, would not be the first rambling on the list.
> >
> >
> >Shayne.
> >