[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Interference Engines
In message <firstname.lastname@example.org> "R. Cummings" writes:
> When this subject comes up, I believe it is suggested the 2.2 liter NA
> engine in my 87 Coupe GT should be a non interference engine. However, when
> the water pump failed and the cam stopped turning, it bent the valves in a
> couple of the cylinders. I repaired it myself so I actually saw the dings in
> the top of the pistons and the bent valves.
Non-interference when hand turned. At high revs, in the lap of the
gods. Some get lucky, some don't.
Phone: 0385 302803 Fax: 01536 723021
(The contents of this post will _NOT_ appear in the UK Newsletter.)