[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Dan Simoes wrote:
]So it can be done. But, should it?
such a tough question! i *know* i am benefitting
from eavesdropping on threads about torsen, for
instance, though i doubt i'll own a car with this
in the remote future. i have been pleased to learn
about the whole line of cars.
]One idea I have is to segment the lists something like this:
]several "type" lists: 4k/80/90/CQ, 5k/100/200/S4/S6. But, where does that
]leave the urQ? On the 4k list, or on the latter, since it uses a turbo
]engine? The real danger in segmenting is that valuable knowledge will
]be lost. Phil will read the urQ list but why should he read the 5k
]list, since he doesn't have one (applying the logic of those recently crying
]for the type 44 list)
heh, don't forget to mention the "crying" on the nay
side, too, dan. anyway, i can see the danger, as an
urq driver, especially one that'll have a 5kq engine
in it in about 4 weeks. i'd subscribe to both, most
likely. i delete a lot of messages when i gt too busy
anyway. this list is an oddity in that it focuses on
a feature across audi's whole line of cars - and we're
not even specific to that (hi huw! :) all the time,
which i also find just great.
]Still, segmenting can be done, if we figure out where to draw broad circles.
]"Old" cars vs "new"?
could be. in the end, someone can just form a list and
look for interested people. i'll stay on the q list
for sure, and probably join other relavent lists.
two strokes are faster than four!
this message was composed using the vi editor.
'83 ur-q - yamaha rz350 - suzuki ts250 - chaotic good