RE: UrQ with K24, anyone with track experiences??

[Paolo.Trione@semagroup.it]

Sorry what's an UrQ?

Paolo

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De:	John Karasaki [SMTP:johkar@teleport.com]
> Date:	mercredi 4 août 1999 07:41
> À:	Matthew Pfeffer; Joseph Rae; AudiQtroCp@aol.com
> Cc:	quattro-digest@audifans.com
> Objet:	Re: UrQ with K24, anyone with track experiences??
> 
> Here's fuel for the fire: I'm considering selling my urq and getting a 951
> or 951S.  Why?  Because once I drove a 944, even bad examples (some
> unmaintained roaches), it was tough to think about anything else.  IMHO,
> for the money, there is no better all around performance vehicle
> available.
>  Even the bad examples were pretty good driving and driver's machines.
> 
> Don't get me wrong; our urq is one of the better performing examples of
> the
> marque.  There are a few list members that can attest to that.  It's just
> not as balanced as the 951 -- and never will be without serious
> modification and $$$.  Much easier to buy a 951 instead.
> 
> If you want to harass ferraris, corvettes, and 911's on the track, get a
> 951.  If you need to drive in the rain, snow and ice, however, stick with
> a
> urq.
> 
> Just my opinion.  No flames please.
> 
> 
> At 12:19 AM 8/2/99 -0000, Matthew Pfeffer wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>And the Urq gets many many more looks and comments then the common
> porsche
> >>944
> >
> >
> >I would question that statement.  I would guestimate that 99% of the US
> >population does not know the difference between an UrQ and a CoupeGT.
> >Moreover, 99% of the US population equates a Porsche with
> speed/money/style.
> >
> >Real car people would know the history and importance of an UrQ.
> However,
> >real car people would also know that if you are a driver, a slightly
> tweaked
> >944T is the Porsche of choice.
> >
> >Matt Pfeffer
> >
> >
> Best Regards,
> 
> John Karasaki