[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Additional torsen stability factor - was Alignment
In message <email@example.com> QSHIPQ@aol.com writes:
> >This, IMO, is what's happening. It's bad alignment, especially at the
> >rear. My car is now booked in to BR Motorsport this Thursday, and I'll
> >see if I can get a copy of the Type 44 specifications.
> Perfect! Sounds good to me! Now, if you have addressed the rears and not
> the fronts, you only partially addressed the issue. To address the fronts,
> you need new rubber on the swaybar. Give us a report on the before and
> after. We could all learn from your experience Phil. Please let us, cuz
> your statements come up short in theory, application and documentation.
The fronts did not need 'addressing' because the PO had the front
rebuilt about three months before I bought it. Yes, it was well out of
specification (mainly right camber) but Martin reset it as a matter of
Short in theory, application and documentation? Well, I think I'm the
only one who's posted complete specifications for any chassis. In fact,
in straight fact terms, _YOU_ are the one seriously lacking.
I've got a deal. I'll get the Type 44 specifications, and we agree an
independent escrow from the list. I send mine, you send yours, and the
escrow then publishes both.
How about that?
UK Audi quattro Owners Club
Phone: 07785 302803 Fax: 0870 0883933