RE: Torsen tech

[QSHIPQ@aol.com]

Dave writes
>err scott, if you really understand what you are saying here, then you'd
>appreciate that the locker at the point where the torsen is at bias ratio,
>is *more* likely to have an oversteer moment due to it's inability to stop
>biasing torque to the rear.  it will keep sending torque to the rear on
>power inputs until something gives up.  major change in cf?  you need to
>think that through a little for the locker scenario before you write too
>much more here ;-o

I'd rather stick to the torsen, that is the discussion.  Once we get done 
with that, you are welcome to prove how superior a torsen is to a locker.  

>i think that you are so used to arguing, that you're just doing it out of
>habit...

In fairness to my promise, I'm hoping you can limit the phologenous 
statements as well.  I'm all for you proving me wrong Dave.  To date, we 
haven't accepted that a 75r/25f torsen allocation is O, and 50/50>75f/35r is 
U.  Is that a reasonable conclusion?

Thanks

Scott Justusson