RE: Torsen tech

["Dave Eaton" <Dave.Eaton@clear.net.nz>]

no of course it isn't.  just as it isn't a fair statement to say that 25:75
torque in a locker is oversteer.  anymore than it is fair to say that 0:100
torque to the rear in a bmw (by definition) is oversteer.  it isn't, because
in the chassis, it's mostly understeer.

i really don't know where you think you can go with an argument with the
fundamentals misunderstood....

dave
'95 rs2
'90 ur-q
'88 mb 2.3-16

-----Original Message-----

Date: Mon, 1 Nov 1999 08:39:04 EST
From: QSHIPQ@aol.com
Subject: RE:  Torsen tech

I'm all for you proving me wrong Dave.  To date, we
haven't accepted that a 75r/25f torsen allocation is O, and 50/50>75f/35r is
U.  Is that a reasonable conclusion?