[200q20v] S4 Injectors
b.m.benz at prodigy.net
Sun Dec 10 10:20:30 EST 2000
IMO, altering the exhaust cam or cam timing designed for turbo use is a mod.
least likely to provide any benefit. Cams optimumized for forced induction
are of short duration and timed for zero or very small overlap. There is
nothing much to be gained by changing within this critera. The gain is in
the forced induction. See Chris Miller's web page, engine parts, the
exhaust cams are the same across the spectrum of S5 engines.
> From: "Paul Friedenberg" <paulcsu at hotmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 08:45:26
> To: b.m.benz at prodigy.net
> Subject: Re: [200q20v] S4 Injectors
> I would expect something of a performance increase, since I have heard of UR
> S4-S6 owners using the RS2 exhaust cam. I was just wondering if anyone has
> used this on a 200.
>> From: Bernie Benz <b.m.benz at prodigy.net>
>> To: Paul Friedenberg <paulcsu at hotmail.com>
>> CC: 200q20V mailing list <200q20v at audifans.com>
>> Subject: Re: [200q20v] S4 Injectors
>> Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 15:59:03 -0800
>> Re: Cams. What would you expect to achieve by replacing with RS2 exhaust
>> cam? Have you quantified the differences in duration and timing, or is
>> just a WAG?
>> I don't know for sure, but would bet that the S4 injdctors are the same
>> operating at a different base pressure.
>>> From: "Paul Friedenberg" <paulcsu at hotmail.com>
>>> Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 20:35:44
>>> To: 200q20v at audifans.com
>>> Subject: [200q20v] S4 Injectors
>>> Has anyone used S4 injectors on their chipped 200 with good results? I
>>> heard that they flow more fuel. Also, has anyone used a RS2 exhaust cam
>>> a performance increase?
>>> Paul Friedenberg
>>> '91 200
>>> Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download :
>>> 200q20v mailing list
>>> 200q20v at audifans.com
> Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com
More information about the 200q20v