[200q20v] FS: 282 BHP 3B ECUs from Europe
brett at cloud9.net
Mon Dec 31 14:27:20 EST 2001
At 5:12 PM -0800 12/30/01, Orin Eman wrote:
>Come on, he was perfectly correct to say 1.4 bar boost.
>'Boost' is by definition MAP - atmospheric. Unfortunately,
>the word boost is what is usually used incorrectly around here
>and that is what should be corrected.
Yeah, true. But the majority uses the term the wrong way, we should
at least be consistent :-)
>> > and a twin-cone K&N airfilter
>> Complete garbage. Cone filters do not provide smooth enough airflow
>> for the MAF sensor, and K&N elements do not provide sufficient
>It's closer to 400 HP when the airflow becomes a problem.
>I still wouldn't use a K&N though due to the unreliability
>of the filtering.
Yeah, not to mention the fact that the stock airbox is perfectly fine
for almost any HP levels people choose to run. The claim that the
twin-cone filter yields "another .2 bar" means someone has been
inhaling the fumes from that spray can of K&N oil...
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Ben Franklin
http://www.users.cloud9.net/~brett/bdikeman.asc (PGP Public Key)
More information about the 200q20v