[200q20v] 3 pin vs. 4 pin multifunction temp sender?
b.m.benz at prodigy.net
Tue Jan 2 06:53:47 EST 2001
Reliability is the only issue.
> From: Brett Dikeman <brett at pdikeman.ne.mediaone.net>
> Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 00:35:20 -0500
> To: Bernie Benz <b.m.benz at prodigy.net>, Steve Bednarski
> <stevebednarski at mindspring.com>
> Subject: Re: [200q20v] 3 pin vs. 4 pin multifunction temp sender?
> At 9:01 PM -0800 12/21/00, Bernie Benz wrote:
>> Yes, by all means! I've never had a "new" 3 pin sensor from my local AW
>> fail. Don't accept 4 pins, even if they agree to break one off.
> There is no functional difference between the two. Either is
> acceptable for use.
> Brett Dikeman Systems Engineer
> ProAct Technologies Corporation 914-872-8043
> (formerly CFN[formerly iClick, Inc]) 914-872-8100(fax)
> 120 Bloomingdale Rd. http://www.proacttechnologies.com
> White Plains, NY 10605
> PGP Fingerprint: 06C2 5D5B D2B4 7626 BB24 2BBC 9E4A C8B3
> PGP Key location: http://pdikeman.ne.mediaone.net/pgp/brett.pgp
More information about the 200q20v