FW: [200q20v] RE: Greater than 225's?

C1J1Miller at aol.com C1J1Miller at aol.com
Tue Jan 30 14:29:03 EST 2001

I used the 255's on the track without rubbing, after that little plastic spot on the driver's rear inner fender wore a bit.  
Bought/used them because they were a smokin' deal (tires/rims for $750).

In a message dated Tue, 30 Jan 2001  2:21:51 PM Eastern Standard Time, "Beer, Jerald" <jbeer at BooseCasey.com> writes:

<< Chris
  I used a Ford tool (BFH) on the rear inside fenders to make, ahem, minor
adjustments for clearance. Only problem with 255's was when the car was
leaned way over to the right (left hand turn) very slight rubbing. Track
tire remains 245-45/16, better fit, many choices.  My et is only 40 IIRC.

-----Original Message-----
From: C1J1Miller at aol.com [mailto:C1J1Miller at aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 1:01 PM
To: jbeer at boosecasey.com
Cc: 200q20v at audifans.com
Subject: Re: [200q20v] RE: Greater than 225's?

I've been running 255/40r17's et 35 on my car, with no spacers, no rubbing
except driver's rear fender liner, where about 2"x1/8" has worn a bit.
Works fine.


More information about the 200q20v mailing list