[200q20v] Re: [V8] V8 and 200q20v difference
David.Coleman at blackrock.com
Tue Feb 5 14:16:51 EST 2002
Interesting... I have a Motor Trend at home that tests a '91 V8 5-speed
that gives 0-60 of 6.5 (I think -- I'll double check tonight). I also
recall a recent post quoting 6.6 seconds. Either way, I didn't know the
two were that close in performance (numbers, at least)...
I also now realize I may be a bit biased, since my V8 has an IA ECU,
good for about 7 hp.
I don't suppose anyone has recorded a lap time for either model at VIR
or Summit Point? Any other tracks?
> > I have a very hard time believing the V8 is faster
> > (except mebbe off the line) or gets better MPG.
> It isn't. I'm looking through the 1991 sales brochure for the
> 200q20v and
> they quote a 0-60 time of 6.5 seconds and a top speed of 150,
> while for the
> 5-speed V8 they quote a 0-60 time of 7.1 seconds and a top
> speed of 152. Not
> bad for a 4000lb highway cruiser but still slower off the
> line than the
> 200q20v. Gas consumption is also on the 200q20v side. It has
> epa figures of
> 18 city and 24 highway while the v8 has 14/18.
> By the way it was interesting to read what Audi called the
> ufo brakes. They
> are "friction ring with internal front caliper".
> George ... indulging in Audi trivia
> 91 V8
> Jackson, NJ
> Audifans v8 mailing list
> Send posts to: mailto:v8 at audifans.com
> Manage your list options: http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/v8
More information about the 200q20v