[s-cars] Purchase '91 200 20V?
brett at cloud9.net
Tue Oct 1 01:21:38 EDT 2002
At 11:11 PM -0400 9/30/02, Martin, Gary G wrote:
>I have both, a 94 S4 and a 91 200 20V Avant. I don't think parts
>availability will be a problem. Performance..acceleration about the same. I
>have an IA 3+ chip in my 200 and a Wetterauer chip in the S4. I'd say my 200
>is faster. Handling..S4 is much better. More rigid frame. The S4 is more
>sophisticated, more features, better stereo, etc. I like both cars, but they
>are very different. Much heavier feel of controls in 200, ie., steering,
>clutch, shifter, etc. If I had only one, it would be the S4. Best advice
>would be drive both, then decide.
The above summary is one of the best I've seen in this age-old
topic(To S or not to S.)
My only 2 cents here would be that chances are you're likely to love
whatever you end up with; decide on your budget, and go from there.
Both are extremely capable, fun cars, and if you pay extra for the
S-car, you get what you paid for, but you will not be disappointed in
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Ben Franklin
More information about the 200q20v