Rattles, was Re: More UFO rambling.....

Arun Rao rao at pixar.com
Mon Sep 30 07:51:53 EDT 2002

Yes, I'm with Taka on this one.  The chassis design is old  (ca.
1983!), and just isn't in the same league with respect to rigidity.
I've driven an ur-S4, and I have a neu-S4, and both are a lot better.

That being said,  the old girl pretty much feels the same at 152K as it
(she!) did at 37K -- pretty darn good, I'd say.


'91 200Q
'00 S4

On Monday, September 30, 2002, at 06:01  AM, t44tq at mindspring.com wrote:

> I've noticed the same thing relative to newer cars-
> I think it's a matter of chassis stiffness. There is
> no comparison between a E46 BMW and a type 44 in chassis
> stiffness- the E46 is far, far stiffer.
> Taka
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.391 / Virus Database: 222 - Release Date: 9/19/02
> _______________________________________________
> 200q20v mailing list
> 200q20v at audifans.com
> http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/200q20v

More information about the 200q20v mailing list