[s-cars] RE: Catalytic Converters
pizzoman at yahoo.com
Mon Dec 29 21:21:56 EST 2003
Hey, I resemble that remark.
--- Mark Strangways <strangconst at rogers.com> wrote:
> Yeah, but Pizzo used olive oil in the motor.
> That's why it didn't pass.
> Mark S
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "TM" <t44tq at mindspring.com>
> To: "'Beer, Jerald S.'" <jbeer at boosecasey.com>
> Cc: "S-Car-List" <s-car-list at audifans.com>;
> <200q20v at audifans.com>
> Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 4:45 PM
> Subject: [s-cars] RE: Catalytic Converters
> > Pizzo needs to chime here, but IIRC, his '94 S4
> would not
> > pass emissions w/o a cat.
> > Don't know if that is 100% correct- I'd install my
> bypass pipe
> > if that were the case.
> > No dyno testing on an AWD anywhere yet, AFAIK.
> Definitely not the
> > case in PA, NJ or NY.
> > Taka
> > -----Original Message-----
> > Well, new cats will help, but I would suggest that
> a well tuned 20v
> > should not need cats to pass emissions. I don't
> know how much stricter
> > California is than Florida ( it had emissions
> testing until 3 or 4 years
> > ago), but I can assure you that catless cats did
> not prevent a certain
> > black avant from passing Florida emissions with
> flying colors (not
> > betting into the cat vs. no cat for pollution
> debate here). So while
> > new, and bigger (as Ned points
> > out) cats should help, you may still have other
> > Regards,
> > Jerry
> > 91 200qa (here, kitty, kitty...)
> > _______________________________________________
> > S-CAR-List mailing list
> > S-CAR-List at audifans.com
> S-CAR-List mailing list
> S-CAR-List at audifans.com
The following statement is false.
The preceding statement is true.
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
More information about the 200q20v