pjrose at frontiernet.net
Wed Jan 28 15:41:18 EST 2004
At 7:36 AM -0800 1/28/04, Wolff wrote:
>That really depends on your criterion for defining "good". I changed a 98k
>mile belt when I first got my 200. It was still turning the cam around, so I
>guess it was still "good". However, it wasn't going to be good much longer
>with all the serious cracks it had in it. Also, it was very loose and the
>distributer was rattling. I wouldn't call it as good as a new one.
> > A 100K TB is just as good as is a new one.
Wolf, I think that Bernie is just jerking (rattling?) our chains. ;-)
mailto:pjrose at frontiernet.net
More information about the 200q20v