fun topic: 200q20v VS. URS4
pcschulz at comcast.net
Fri Jul 11 09:52:03 PDT 2008
At 09:39 AM 7/11/2008 -0700, you wrote:
>please educate me on the differences b/t the URS4 (1992-1995.5) and
>from what i currently understand:
>- URS4 has steel head gasket - so can handle more boost - easy
>enough fix for the 200q20v
not always true - there have been folks with 95 S6s who found this to
be false ;-(
>- both use basically the same engine and turbo
ECU is completely different, much more diagnostic capability and
UrS4/S6 came with "overboost" option to 227hp...
>- what are teh differences in the trannies? i've heard the URS4 has
>a weak 2nd gear.
early 01Es, yes, but 95.5 S6 01E is one of the strongest that Audi has made
>- URS4 has DIS ignition
>- i assume URS4 has a tighter chassis
>- URS4 has less niggly issues with the electronics
debatable, yes, they don't seem to have a similar weak spot in the
instrument cluster such as the 200, but they also (other than the
1992) dont have the multifunction trip computer or boost gauge...;-)
>- what else?
>from my personal opinion, i chose the 200q20v because the URS4 seem
>to be much more expensive. the bag for the buck award seems to go to
>finally, i don't know about you guys, but the 200q20v looks much
>more sexy and original than the URS4. the 200q20v has, at least to
>me, has the perfect combination of swoopy lines, but still some
>sharp edges for contrast. the URS4 always looked like a bloated A4
>to me. sort of just looked like everything else on the road.
>what are your thoughts?
>200q20v mailing list http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/200q20v
Chelmsford Ma, USA
1995.5 S6 Avant Emerald/Ecru
1995.5 S6 Avant Silver/Platinum
1991 200 20v Q Avant Titan Grey (for sale)
1991 90 20v Q Red
1991 CQ silver (eS2 recipient)
More information about the 200q20v