Why are 200q20v's worthless?
centaurus3200 at yahoo.com
Thu Sep 4 09:44:51 PDT 2008
i don't think you need a standalone for more than 280HP, you need a bigger turbo. pretty sure 280HP is all the little K24's got to give.
--- On Thu, 9/4/08, Richard Harris <rnharris at bellsouth.net> wrote:
From: Richard Harris <rnharris at bellsouth.net>
Subject: RE: Why are 200q20v's worthless?
To: centaurus3200 at yahoo.com
Date: Thursday, September 4, 2008, 9:45 AM
Why? Some people want more than 280HP without going standalone.
1992 S4 Rs2d
1991 200 20V Hill-billy Track car
From: 200q20v-bounces at audifans.com
[mailto:200q20v-bounces at audifans.com]On Behalf Of robert weinberg
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 8:17 PM
To: 200q20V mailing list
Subject: Why are 200q20v's worthless?
i was perusing the various audi classsifieds wow, how depressing. it kills
me. it's not like the 200 is only worth it's engine. throw
on some decent struts, springs and some larger/wider rims with good tires
- and go hit the twisties!
with ian's IA3+ ECU (280HP), koni, H&R, 034 billet bypass, 17" A4
rims and kuhmo escta SPT tires - i just ATTACKED skyline blvd in
oakland, ca. The Blue Bastard corners like a mofo and once on boost - it's
more exhilarating than a friggen rollercoaster ;-)
it's amazing what people view as "desirable". while our cars are
pack of chewing gum, 1991-1994 BMW M5 are holding steady.and you have people
ripping out the 3B to put in a URQ, coupe quattro or 4000Q.
oh well, i'm not planning on selling and don't have buyer's remorse
(although i wish i bought that clean 200q20v with 91k in LA - but it wasn't
available when i was looking).
it's just a trip. i could see lackluster resale if the thing was a gutless
crap can. but with minimal mods - you have a low 14 second car with AWD and
finish level of a damn S-Class Mercedes!
okay - off soapbox ;-)
200q20v mailing list http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/200q20v
More information about the 200q20v