[A4] timing belts and "interference" engines
caliban at sharon.net
Fri Sep 29 17:32:07 EDT 2006
i'd take a KH (but isn't it MC?) over WX any day. just sayin' -
you still got cheated.
At 1:14 PM -0700 9/29/06, Tom Love wrote:
>Bought a car a few years back that was advertised as having the motor
>replaced with new by Audi 20k back. Got receipts with all kinds of parts
>numbers so I took the bait. Turns out that in fact it was a new motor put in
>by Audi but the incorrect one! KH turbo (Audi 5k) instead of WX (urq) and
>about 30hp shy of original issue. I made it clear when I sold it that KH was
>the engine. So would I pay more for that new motor? Only if it came fresh
>out of the box and the codes were correct (or better) for the year/model.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "thejimrose" <thejimrose at gmail.com>
>To: <brogers at terrix.com>
>Cc: <a4 at audifans.com>
>Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 12:27 PM
>Subject: Re: [A4] timing belts and "interference" engines
>> well if it was an audi crate motor then sure..
>> anyway in this case i would ask high book or a little over and use the
>> new motor as leverage. it didnt cost you anything so at least you can
>> maximise the reasonable value of the car, and give it an edge over
>> other cars at anywhere near the same $.
>> me as a buyer would have very different opinions than me as a seller. =)
>> On 9/29/06, Brandon Rogers <brogers at terrix.com> wrote:
>>> Hmm I totally disagree. Were I in the market for an A4 1.8T - I'd
>>> probably pay an extra thousand or so for the brand new motor, assuming
>>> all else equal - remember Rick said new head and block - NOT rebuilt.
>>> And to me a broken t-belt does not attach itself as baggage to the rest
>>> of the car - t-bely is known failure on these - and now you have a car
>>> with a brand new motor.
>>> Now you have to conflicting opinions ...big help huh!
>>> Good luck-
>>> '84 urquattro 20Vt
>>> '01.5 S4
>>> '98 A4 1.8Tq
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: a4-bounces at audifans.com [mailto:a4-bounces at audifans.com] On Behalf
>>> Of thejimrose
>>> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 12:50 PM
>>> To: a4 at audifans.com
>>> Subject: Re: [A4] timing belts and "interference" engines
>>> i dont know if i would pay a premuim for a rebuilt engine. your car has
>>> baggage now... you might find many people would be willing to pay less
>>> for it. i know that if i had the choice of 2 cars, 1 with a factory
>>> higher mileage motor with no issues and 1 with a dealer rebuild i'd go
>>> for the issue-less car.
>>> but on the open market, with an audi noob, you might find someone thats
>>> willing to pay at or over the high book value.
>>> A4 mailing list
>>> A4 at audifans.com
>> nobody ever listened to me until they didn't know who i was.
>> A4 mailing list
>> A4 at audifans.com
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.1.407 / Virus Database: 268.12.10/459 - Release Date: 9/29/2006
>A4 mailing list
>A4 at audifans.com
"I hope you weren't stupid enough to be offended by what I said"
More information about the A4