[BiturboS4] S4 without a turbo? (was.. something else)
matt_20v at yahoo.com
Thu Jan 30 13:53:08 EST 2003
--- California Fields <cfields72 at hotmail.com> wrote:
> [ Converted text/html to text/plain ]
> Oh, and we're really at a loss here with a 344hp
> (stock) car that weighs no
> more than the previous model and has a stiffer body
> and better
> tires/suspension (read sarcasm). Looks to me like
> Audi took a step forward.
> It will be just harder (or more expensive to modify
> now, that's all).
I'm warming up to the idea of an NA V8 S4. While
I come from the school that an Audi should have
AWD and at least one turbo (so much so that I spent
a wad putting a turbo motor into the '91 coupe), there
really is a drivability difference without a turbo.
While the 2.7T is a huge improvement from the older
K24/K26 turbo engines, it still obviously has a
turbo- a little lag and that shudder when you release
the throttle. The V8 would be smooth smooth smooth.
And a 344HP V8 Avant is sortof full circle for those
like me that got lugged around as a kid in old
Detroit wagons. So I dunno...
'91cq- 20v turbo
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
More information about the Biturbos4