[Biturbos4] Acura RL

Quincy Chiang b5quattro at shaw.ca
Fri Oct 22 20:31:46 EDT 2004

Agreed.  In fact if it doesn't have a turbo(s) (or a supercharger) to begin with, it's very likely to be way less mod-able than engines with them.  Also for the RL in particular, it's first and foremost mission is to be a luxury car, so I highly doubt there'll be much aftermarket support at all.


----- Original Message -----
From: ti at amb.org (Ti Kan)
Date: Thursday, October 21, 2004 4:59 pm
Subject: Re: [Biturbos4] Acura RL

> Aurangzeb M. Agha writes:
> > >What is it about the new S4 that you're not enamored by?  It 
> seems to be a
> > >logical upgrade to the S4 biturbo.  I haven't yet driven one, 
> but everyone
> > >is singing praises about the improved chassis and handling, 
> braking, shift
> > >feel, and that lovely V8.
> >
> > ...
> > I also have the impression (perhaps a false one) that this car 
> won't be as 
> > mod-able as my current S4.  Which, BTW, I haven't modded yet, 
> but I COULD 
> > if I WANTED to.  :-)
> The biturbo S4 and the 1.8T cars are some of the most mod-able cars
> around.  It is quite true that the V8 S4 won't be as mod-able (at 
> leastin relatively cost terms).  However, what makes you think 
> that the Acura RL
> (or any other new AWD contender out there) would even come close to
> the mod-ability of the biturbo S4?
> -Ti
> -- 
> Ti Kan
> http://www.amb.org/ti
> Vorsprung durch Technik
> _______________________________________________
> Biturbos4 mailing list
> Biturbos4 at www.audifans.com
> http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/biturbos4

More information about the Biturbos4 mailing list