[Fwd: 88 90 heater core]
ttauskey at worldnet.att.net
Tue Dec 11 15:11:39 EST 2001
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 10:20:18 -0700
From: THOMAS TAUSKEY <ttauskey at worldnet.att.net>
Reply-To: ttauskey at worldnet.att.net
To: one at humanspeakers.com
Subject: Re: 88 90 heater core
References: <200112110427.XAA10082 at www.audifans.com> <3C15A5B4.BF6B3D43 at worldnet.att.net> <3C15CF46.E419B964 at mediaone.net>
X-Plaintext: Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Well, yeah, but maybe half a decade too soon judging by my '69 F 100 (on second core) and '81 Jetta (orig. still going) - and how about the Corvair - which has none
(substituting gas * CO * for the liquid chemistry issues associated with ethelyne/propylene glycol).
But....I guess my point is, doesn't it seem that heater core failures are more common in the 80/90's vintage 1988-1992?
Anyone have analyses/history /comments on evolvment of heater/core designs through various models?
And.... I still think a Dremel tool mit cutoff wheel MIGHT provide access to change out the core through the firewall/cowl area - in about umm... say 20 minutes.
I'm looking for a volunteer.......
Huw Powell wrote:
> > Still haven't done heater core on mine --but go to Alex's site for a comprehensive description of this job
> > http://surf.to/the80pages.com
> me neither, but I "took one out" once...
> > I haven't yet got the replacement core and pose this additional question to the list .....
> > While it seems that the heater core element is fairly readily available, are there significant differences between replacement products? Put another way, how come these heater
> > cores seem to fail so often? What component manufacturer's product (cores) are to be avoided?
> I don't think heater cores failing every decade or so is that bad,
> really. Isn't that a prety typical lifespan for a part like this?
> Huw Powell
More information about the quattro