[torsen] Re: [urq] RE: Quattro handling
QSHIPQ at aol.com
QSHIPQ at aol.com
Sat Apr 13 10:11:46 EDT 2002
In a message dated 4/13/02 7:10:45 AM Central Daylight Time,
Dave.Eaton at clear.net.nz writes:
>this is a common enough mis-understanding. what i stated is correct.
>you cannot control torque distribution when a diff is locked. when it is
>*unlocked* torque is "locked" to 50:50% (i.e. the torque distributed is
>exactly the same as that of the torque supported by the least tractive
Minhea, this is correct. For more, go to Torsen at audifans.com
>the only other issue with the locked centre is that, in tight
>turns, the car will understeer due to axle wind-up..
More specifically, both axles must rotate at the same speed, so the steering
wheels with the most slip will slip more, causing U.
>all later audi's understeer more than i like - mind you so do most modern
>cars fwd, & rwd. the late ur-quattro doesn't (it is better than e.g. my old
>s2). however, both the torsen and non-torsen cars can get into a situation
>where they will understeer excessively and only lifting and unwinding the
>steering will help. lfb also works well with my cars...
The problem with torsens in urq's or 90q, is that under power up, torque
transfer fore and aft causes more U than the locker. This is because the
sudden power shift at the limit of adhesion first overloads front/rear
tractive ability, then the rear/front tractive ability. I have a really neat
back to back video of this in action at Steamboat my locker urq vs S4tt in a
snow/ice roundabout. The s4tt drifted all the way out to the outside,
whereas the urq was able to stay much more centered on track.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Torsen