[urq] TR: Why are the L5 Turbo engine sounds different ?Louis-Alain Richard larichard at plguide.comWed Feb 11 11:52:36 PST 2009
Redirect from the mother list. Louis-Alain -----Message d'origine----- De : quattro-bounces at audifans.com [mailto:quattro-bounces at audifans.com] De la part de fdekat Envoyé : 11 février 2009 07:41 À : quattro at audifans.com Objet : Why are the L5 Turbo engine sounds different ? >Louis-Alain Richard larichard at plguide.com >Tue Feb 10 18:33:46 PST 2009 >Spent the night at the pub with Brady (urQ, 4kq, 200qa20v, 240Z) and Geraint >(200qa10v, 964, GTI Mk2, Spridget), obviously most of the talk was about >cars. One question is still unsolved : why is the sound of the L5 10VT and >20VT so different ? We have some thoughts about it, but I'd like to hear >from others. >We agreed that the 10VT is better sounding : rougher, deeper, richer. >What is the list wisdom on this ? Which is better, but more important, why >the difference ? You ask a very good question, and one that I have wondered about also.. I think I *may* have an answer. I now have two urqs, both with MC1 conversions in them. However, one has a K26 turbo, and the other has a K24 turbo. I'm thinking that the different turbos may be the reason for a lot of the difference in sound. All other things being (almost) equal in my case, the one with the K26 sounds *soooo* much tougher. Now if you look at the naked turbos, there is a fair amount of difference in the turbo outlet size. My theory is that the much smalller turbo outlet of the K24 turbo does a much better job of acting like a 'muffler', and keeps the interesting noises trapped inside, while the larger K26 turbo lets the good sounds out.. :-) =Frank de Kat= _______________________________________________ quattro mailing list quattro at audifans.com http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/quattro --- Watch this space for ads :)
More information about the urq mailing list |