[urq] Engine rebuild?dgraber460 at aol.com dgraber460 at aol.comSat Jul 11 05:39:52 PDT 2009
I missed the first part of this thread. What was it doing that you pulled the head? First glance; 1 the plugs look terrible 2 cylinder walls appear to have no cross hatch left 3 and there doesn't seem to be any of the usual cracks between valves. Dennis Denver -----Original Message----- From: Maurits Jonkergouw <urquattro at moregraphics.nl> To: Audifans <urq at audifans.com> Sent: Sat, Jul 11, 2009 5:48 am Subject: Re: [urq] Engine rebuild? Hi and thanks everyone who replied before! The head is finally pulled for inspection and here are the results: www.moregraphics.nl/quattro/engine.html Back in 1989 @ 81K km, the block was rebuild with 2x oversized pistons (79,975 mm) (ETKA says 80 mm). Is it still possible to machine to 3x oversize 80,50 mm WR pistons or could I use the non-oversized (81 mm) pistons from MB or RR (3B etc.) instead, without getting problems like compression etc. (i.e. 80,50 or 81 is the pretty much the same volume-wise) The head is obviously ready for rebuild but the cylinderblock looks pretty OK, after the rebuild @ 81K it has done 313-81 = 232K km which still is pretty much... So now I'm thinking of rebuilding the head only and not the cylinders, whould that be bad economy concidering the mileage? Thanks again, Regards, Maurits 1986 quattro GV _______________________________________________ Audifans urq mailing list Manage your list connection: http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/urq http://www.audifans.com/kb/List_information Interested in helping make urq26 happen? Send an e-mail to urq list admin. Pictures/Polls/Database at: http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/urquattro/
More information about the urq mailing list |