cyoung1661 at rogers.com
Wed Jun 13 23:14:32 EDT 2007
Tires are a very personal choice , and you will find there are as many
opinions as there are tire brands. Michelin are an outstanding tire , but
can you justify the price and tread life ? better grip and handling
translate into limited tire life. On my Porsches I have always run
Bridgestone ( RE 050) and really like them, on the Audi I have a cheap no
name brand, I have a FWD as you do but see no appreciable wear after
30,000km. I also have only 15 nch wheels, this allows for more side wall
flex, and although the handling is not exceptional ( that is what the 911 is
for ) I find the tires are lasting. I hear Kuhmo escta are good value for
money but have never persoanlly tried them . I second the tire rack review
route also, the continental was prefered by at least one user over the Kuhmo
as I was just hecking yesterday
----- Original Message -----
From: "Casimiro Izquierdo" <caig01 at yahoo.com>
To: "Audi Fans" <v6-12v at audifans.com>
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2007 7:27 PM
Subject: [V6-12v] Tires
> What is the consensus regarding tires for a 2002 A6, between Continentals
> and Michelins? I have to buy a set of four for this car very soon and
> would like to know what is the main difference between an XGT Michelin and
> its comparable counterpart in Continentals.
> Someone, who works for Continental was non committal when asked the
> question, but did remark that the side walls of the Continentals is
> thicker and that they ride a bit harsher and make a bit more noise. On
> the positive side he said that the thicker sidewalls aided in handling.
> Is the above observation, made by the Continental rep, correct? What has
> been the groups experience with Continentals? I have been using Michelins
> on an Audi 90S and a 740i BMW, but would not mind improving handling if it
> is possible.
> Thank you.
> a vacation? Get great deals
> to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel.
> V6-12v mailing list
> V6-12v at audifans.com
More information about the V6-12v