[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: BMW I6 vs Audi V6 vs VW VR6
At 06:05 PM 4/8/96 -0400, Hugh Odom wrote:
>> re: engine power vs BMW 2.8l
>> 172hp vs 189/190 hp? What's the big deal.
>> If you want to complain, take aim at the
>> Audi auto transmission. Very sluggish.
>>a) audi 2.8 is 12 valve.
>>b) bmw 2.8 is 24 valve.
>>Audi's 2.8L w/ 30 valves w/ variable intake manifold and
>>camshaft puts out 193hp.
>I think his point was 18 hp doesn't seem like a vast horsepower difference.
>What I want to know is (never having driven either car), why does the auto
>press universally "rave" about the VW 2.8 VR6 (172 hp or so) and universally
>rate the Audi 2.8 as "lukewarm", "adequate", etc. The VR6, with only 2
The auto press raves about the VR6 because of its innovative size. This
allows the engine to be fit easily in very small, light
>Come to think of it, I wonder if that VR6 would fit in a 5 cylinder slot?
It would easily fit...don't know if it would be worth the trouble though.
Several companies will put the VR6 in the smaller VW's...about
$24,000 for a 92 GTI with the VR6. Haven't seen it done with an Audi.
Orange County, California ftp.kaiwan.com/user/jstevens
email@example.com University of California, San Diego
Multimedia Development Center La Jolla, California
"The frontiers are not east or west, north or south, but
wherever a man fronts a fact." -Henry David Thoreau, 1849