[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: urQ vs 944T
A recent thread compared the urQ to the 944T, and it was claimed that the
944T was much faster. I feel obliged to defend the honor of the urQ (not
that I'm at all biased, of course).
What Car did a comparison test a few years ago, and it is reprinted in the
Brooklands "Audi Quattro Gold Portfolio" (pg 116). The Audi tested faster
in acceleration from 0 to the lower speeds, with the Porshe edging it out
starting at about 0 to 60. In the overall choice, What Car gave the nod to
the Quattro, which at that time (9/86) was an older model.
I find it hard (very hard) to believe a stock (US-spec) UrQ could ever
touch a stock 944T "off the line" (at least, without resorting to $50-
launches [you know, where you burn off $50's worth of clutch with each
pass]). On dry pavement, etc. etc.
Stock (US-spec) UrQ's are trounced by clapped-out Nissan pickups "off
the line"! Hell, a turtle on crutches will beat a stock UrQ off the line.
- urQ vs 944T
- From: email@example.com (Richard Funnell)