[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: Interference or not - V6?
Sure about which? About the V6, absolutely. Most of the one's I've seen
that have thrown the belt have bent valves. About the 2.3? Not so much. I
was told it was an interference engine, just as the high compression 2.0
four was, but haven't seen a large enough sample of belt failures to know.
The 2.2 turbo was supposed to be non-interference, but most of them bend
valves when they go. I like the advice about treating all of them as
interference engines. Safer that way.
> From: Steve Valin <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> To: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: Interference or not - V6?
> Date: Thursday, June 19, 1997 1:28 PM
> "Keleigh Hardie" <email@example.com> sez:
> << Non ALL I5's are non-interference. The 2.3's are not.
> And the 12v V6's aren't either. Don't know about the 30v yet. I doubt it.
> interesting. Do you know this for a fact? The last time I had my timing
> belt off, I carefully rotated the cam to see if it was interfering. The
> definitely hit a blockage point, which I assumed was a valve hitting a
> Of course I didn't torque on it very hard to be sure!. With the belt on
> and in the right place, this doesn't happen.